A very happy St Patrick's Day to all my readers and dear friends
Love for Beginners
Monday 17 March 2014
Friday 27 December 2013
Friday 20 December 2013
Meeting Daniel Radcliffe
Just recently, friends of mine introduced me to Daniel Radcliffe. Yes, the very man, of Harry Potter fame. "Please call me Dan, Mary" is the first thing that he said to me. "I will call you Dan", was my reply.
Dan has a firm handshake and his sapphire-blue eyes are even more striking in real life, than they are on film. His current long-locks hairstyle is not his idea and not even his hair! He has had hair extensions for the part of Igor, the assistant to Dr. Frankenstein. Dan joked that his skin is naturally pale enough of the role, and that the make-up artists use a foundation on him called, 'rice-paper'.
The re-make of Mary Shelley's greatest work is being filmed in London at the moment. Mary Shelley, however never created the character of Igor. The hunchback helper of Dr Frankenstein makes no appearance in her horror story. Igor was the creation of film-makers and inserted into the script, as a companion to Dr Frankenstein, to make him seem a less lonely figure. But the deformed helper of Dr Frankenstein has evolved more and more to the point where in the current version, the story is told from the perspective of Igor.
I was quite impressed with Daniel Radcliffe, or 'Dan' as he prefers. People swarm around him all the time, and he remains unflappable, never reacts as though he's pestered and always is the thorough gentleman. I had kept hearing reports that Dan was polite and kind. And it was great to find out that this is true. One such fan is Raymond Arroyo. As a fellow actor, Raymond met up with Dan in June, and congratulated the young Brit on his stellar acting in The Cripple of Inishmaan. Raymond did his classical acting training under Stella Adler, and he esteems Daniel Radcliffe's considerable abilities.
Dan has a firm handshake and his sapphire-blue eyes are even more striking in real life, than they are on film. His current long-locks hairstyle is not his idea and not even his hair! He has had hair extensions for the part of Igor, the assistant to Dr. Frankenstein. Dan joked that his skin is naturally pale enough of the role, and that the make-up artists use a foundation on him called, 'rice-paper'.
The re-make of Mary Shelley's greatest work is being filmed in London at the moment. Mary Shelley, however never created the character of Igor. The hunchback helper of Dr Frankenstein makes no appearance in her horror story. Igor was the creation of film-makers and inserted into the script, as a companion to Dr Frankenstein, to make him seem a less lonely figure. But the deformed helper of Dr Frankenstein has evolved more and more to the point where in the current version, the story is told from the perspective of Igor.
I was quite impressed with Daniel Radcliffe, or 'Dan' as he prefers. People swarm around him all the time, and he remains unflappable, never reacts as though he's pestered and always is the thorough gentleman. I had kept hearing reports that Dan was polite and kind. And it was great to find out that this is true. One such fan is Raymond Arroyo. As a fellow actor, Raymond met up with Dan in June, and congratulated the young Brit on his stellar acting in The Cripple of Inishmaan. Raymond did his classical acting training under Stella Adler, and he esteems Daniel Radcliffe's considerable abilities.
Friday 22 November 2013
Margaret Thatcher's romantic escapades when husband hunting
23 years ago, on November 22, 1990 Mrs Thatcher
resigned. Daniel Hannan says that some of his colleague still refer bleakly to the anti-Thatcher Tory MPs as "the November criminals".
While the details of how she was betrayed are doing the rounds, I'd like to unveil the romantic side of Thatcher, which may sound a contradiction in terms.
She always said that there had been no man before
Dennis, ‘that’s because in those days women had to guard their reputation very
carefully’, said Charles Moore at a talk he gave at Waterstones, High Street Kensington. This was
part of the London History Festival, and Charles Moore was interviewed by Paul
Lay on November 18th, who took the conversation deeper into Lady Thatcher’s
husband hunting.
Dennis was not her first love interest – my ears could
scarcely believe it – when I heard that the young Miss Roberts had ‘various
boyfriends’ and some real disappointments in the dating scene. Moore stressed
that, ‘she needed a husband who understood her ambition’, and 'she would be seen through the prism of her husband'.
While Mrs Thatcher was keen that her travails as a
singleton be veiled from public view, she did actually write the accounts of
her dates and suitors – in her letters to her sister Muriel. Muriel entrusted Charles Moore with the stash
of 150 letters.
The missives detail a ‘complicated’ relationship that
Miss Roberts had with a boyfriend while at Oxford University, but which came to nothing.
The dynamic medic, Dr Robert Henderson held the
attention of the young Miss Roberts, because he was a very skilled scientist
who had developed the iron lung. She considered that being the wife of a
notable doctor might be the right background for her rising star.
But Henderson was twice her age, and when she was 24,
he was 48. Knowing the long years of climbing to power that lay ahead, the
then Miss Roberts knew that the age gap could become unbearable. So, she did not develop
this dalliance. Had they married, he would have been 75 when Thatcher defeated
Heath to become Leader of the Opposition in 1975. And he would have been an
octogenarian in her first year as prime minister.
Most amusing is the case of the 35 year-old Scottish
farmer in Colchester who pursued her relentlessly, until she agreed to go to
dinner with him. At the meal, he laid out all his credentials, including the
fact that his farm was worth a small fortune (two million in today’s money). But
she was not impressed that he gave a measly nine penny tip to the waiter. Remarking
wryly on the evening to Muriel, the young Margaret said, ‘I’d rather like to
see his farm as a matter of interest’. Knowing that he was not for her, the
young Margaret introduced the farmer to Muriel, who was much more open to being
a farmer’s wife, and later the two were married.
Miss Robert’s first impression of Dennis Thatcher were
not exactly the stuff of Mills and Boon, he was not a heart-throb. She described him as, ‘not a very attractive
creature’ who had ‘plenty of money’. On that faithful night that he gave her a
lift into London, he was candid that he didn’t like mixing with people and was timid.
He had been married before, to another Margaret but his first wife had run off with a Baronet.
In their very first meeting, the seeds of their
lifelong relationship were sown – he would be the one to stand back, while she
led, and he would be the one to encourage her without envying her success.
You can read about her romantic escapades in much more detail in Charles Moore's biography Volume One: Not For Turning.
Wednesday 20 November 2013
Michael Fassbender succeeds in making The Counsellor a success: his performance paints a portrait of hubris
As soon as The Counsellor
opened in London, a Spanish friend and I sprinted over to the Fulham cinema. My
friend has fellow Spaniard Penélope Cruz’s interests at heart. And I’m from
Munster, so naturally I cheer for Michael Fassbender. He plays the leading role,
the nameless counsellor who is overwhelmed by his love for his girlfriend (Cruz)
and asks her hand with a costly engagement ring. The counsellor will pay
for it with a one-time drug deal.
Fassbender’s counsellor has a rich variety of personal traits.
He’s a man-in-love, his eyes liquefy when he beholds his fiancée, and he has an
enraptured tone of voice when he whispers poetic sweet-nothings to her (‘you
are a glory…you are a glorious woman’).
In interviews, Fassbender has been quick to identify
that the counsellor’s chief mistake is that he thinks himself cleverer than he
is. He’s a conceited man who may be book-smart, but has little savvy and has
the job of giving advice but paradoxically goes advice to avoid drug
lords. He is also ‘a smart-ass’, which is the term of disaffection used for him
by Ruth, a prisoner client of his.
It’s the scene where he visits Ruth in a gaol cell that
Fassbender proves his acting acumen. Fassbender has taken off the smiling mask
that the counsellor uses for his fiancée, and we see a very self-satisfied
individual, who thinks he’s too good for the imprisoned mother. Every tiny
detail of Fassbender’s performance creates a portrait of hubris.
In the way he throws down the box of cigarettes that he’s
brought for her, the wolfish grin, the glinting eyes and the way that he won’t
sit opposite her but stands over her. The mother entreats him to help her son,
who has just been gaoled and needs $400 bail. With an even bigger smirk, he
agrees to do it, doing so proves his higher station. He can help her son, she
cannot. In return, the mother offers him a sexual favour, to which he replies sniggeringly
that even if she gave it to him; she would still over him $380.
Fassbender smoothly delivers those sickly
smirks or the laughing tones of contempt in which he speaks to Ruth. He
suffuses his voice with a barely-restrained laugh. Ruth is a figure of fun to him.
You might want to strangle Fassbender’s counsellor, but he leaves the same bad
taste in the mouth that these ‘smart-ass’ types do in real life.
Ruth’s son is a drug runner for the Mexican
cartel with whom he is doing a deal. While motorcycling across America with a
drugs parcel, the son is beheaded, his parcel stolen, and the cartel are
convinced that since the counsellor sprung the drug-runner from gaol, that he
is behind the whole counter operation.
They think the condign punishment for the counsellor is
that his loved one be slaughtered. Ironically, the counsellor and Ruth will
both be reduced to the same level, they will both be torn by loss and grief.
She has lost her son, he his beloved.
The film’s failing is that we never *understand* why
the counsellor is so profoundly in love with his intended. Sure, she is
sweet-tempered and beautiful. And over this past weekend, two male friends have
at pains to stress how ‘hot’ she looked lying on the towel in the spa. But,
ultimately our knowledge of her is skin deep. We never see the layers of her
character, her good deeds (or lack of them), would she be a friend in a time of
need.
In simple terms, we never get to know her. We see the counsellor mourn a
beautiful woman who has been butchered, but we don’t grieve with him because our rapport with her is
the same as with a fashion model that we admire on the cover of a magazine.
We may not understand why he loves her, but we believe he loves her. Why else would he grieve her so intensely? But we are dependent on Fassbender’s depiction of
grief ripping through his body, causing his face to fracture in agony, for the
film to make sense.
The film has more sparkle than substance. Yet it
achieves its central objective: to be a morality tale about the hazard of
hubris, and the mighty counsellor falls from a height of his own making. It’s
Fassbender’s depiction of two opposing states of existence that make the film
work; the glutted-with-hubris ‘smart-ass’ who risks everything for easy money,
and then the grief-ridden and guilt-frenzied shaking wreck that
he becomes.
The
key to his success: Fassbender succeeds in authenticating these flawed characters,
because he enters fully into the persona, body-language, tone of voice, without
letting cares about how the real-life Michael Fassbender might be judged when
cinema go-ers watch him act.
Interviewers and journalists always ask Fassbender if he is similar in any way to the characters that he plays. It always strikes me a rather silly line of questioning. The only way for him to go into role as these complicated personalities is to put his instinctive reactions to one side, and submerge himself in the character's mind and adopt their reflexes.
Interviewers and journalists always ask Fassbender if he is similar in any way to the characters that he plays. It always strikes me a rather silly line of questioning. The only way for him to go into role as these complicated personalities is to put his instinctive reactions to one side, and submerge himself in the character's mind and adopt their reflexes.
Aspects of how Fassbender prepares for a role are
common knowledge, such as the way he may read a script 300 times. But were I to
interview Fassbender, top of the list would be how he practises every detail of
body language and tone of voice so as to ‘become’ a character.
Tuesday 5 November 2013
Oh, such a perfect day, I'm glad I spent it with you...
Lou Reed's Perfect Day.
The Vatican led a tribute to Lou Reed when Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi tweeted lyrics from Perfect Day. The first tweet was, 'Oh, it's such a perfect day I'm glad I spend it with you Oh, such a perfect day You just keep me hanging on (Lou Reed)'. This tweet was RT'd 969 times.
Taking lines from Lou Reed's classic song was a way for Cardinal Ravasi to segue into then tweeting the Bible verse, 'Be under no illusion: God will not be fooled. You're going to reap just what you sow (Galatians 6,7 and Lou Reed in Perfect Day)'. This tweet was RT'd 54 times.
I am a practising Catholic, but was not given Bible lessons as a child. The first time that I heard the verse, 'you're going to reap just what you sow', was when I heard the song, Perfect Day at age 11.
It's quite possible that had Perfect Day never been written, then I would not have heard the line from Galatians about reaping good crops if you do good works, and bad crops if you do bad works, until I was much older.
Monday 4 November 2013
Noel Harrison's The Windmills Of Your Mind
The recent death of Noel Harrison on October 19th called to my mind his most famous song, The Windmills Of Your Mind. When I was going to school, circa 2001, I used listen to the song on old vinyl LPs or 'records' as they were called in their hey-day.
It was part of the soundtrack for The Thomas Crown Affair and won the Oscar for best song in 1968. At first, Noel Harrison did not realise the song's potential, "it didn't seem like a big deal at the time. I went to the studio one afternoon and sang it and pretty much forgot about it...I didn't realise until later what a timeless, beautiful piece Michel LeGrand and the Bergmans had written. It turned out to be my most notable piece of work."
Now, I'll have to watch the Steve McQueen Thomas Crown Affair, and see how the lyrics play into the story, 'like a carousel that turning running rings around the moon, like a clock whose hands are sweeping past the minutes of its face, And the world is like an apple whirling silently in space, like the circles that you find in the windmills of your mind... Like a tunnel that you follow to a tunnel of its own...'
It was part of the soundtrack for The Thomas Crown Affair and won the Oscar for best song in 1968. At first, Noel Harrison did not realise the song's potential, "it didn't seem like a big deal at the time. I went to the studio one afternoon and sang it and pretty much forgot about it...I didn't realise until later what a timeless, beautiful piece Michel LeGrand and the Bergmans had written. It turned out to be my most notable piece of work."
Now, I'll have to watch the Steve McQueen Thomas Crown Affair, and see how the lyrics play into the story, 'like a carousel that turning running rings around the moon, like a clock whose hands are sweeping past the minutes of its face, And the world is like an apple whirling silently in space, like the circles that you find in the windmills of your mind... Like a tunnel that you follow to a tunnel of its own...'
Sunday 20 October 2013
Theresa Milstein guest blogs: How I met my husband
For the record, we were not high school
sweethearts.
Physical
Education (PE) was never my favorite class. In my senior year, I found it that
much more unbearable because it took place when my friends ate lunch. I skipped
the class one or two more times more than I should have. The teacher made me
make up the whole semester the spring before graduation.
When
I attended my first “Early Morning Gym,” another PE delinquent stood outside
the door with a cup of coffee. I’d never seen him before, which wasn’t unusual
since it was a large school. He looked kind of… mean in his t-shirt, flannel,
and jeans. He reminded me of Judd Nelson in The Breakfast Club. I avoided
staring at him while we waited for the PE teacher to show up.
Later
that week, a friend in my art class introduced me to PE guy, Stu. Turns out he
wasn’t as mean as he looked. We began hanging out during Early Morning Gym.
During the weight unit, he and I talked until the teacher came by, and then
we’d half-heartedly do a few reps. During the tennis unit, we smoked cigarettes
on the court (this was a long time ago). He made me laugh and in no time, we’d
begun hanging out during our free periods and even after school.
Although
Stu wasn’t my type, I found myself sort of liking him. I tried to flirt, which
may have been more annoying than alluring. But he seemed to like my best friend
more than me. For prom weekend, the three of us held our own anti-prom at a
hotel in the Hamptons. I’d hoped he’d ask me out then, but he didn’t.
Just
as we graduated, a boy who was a year older, and more my type (a musician),
asked me out. That summer, I worked at a local traveling carnival with my PE
friend while I dated my boyfriend.
At
the end of the summer, my boyfriend started his new college in New Orleans. Stu
and I attended local colleges. We were both trying to be better students than
we’d been in high school. Most of our friends had gone away to college, and we
wound up relying on one another more. He set up a second desk in his bedroom so
I could study with him. I kept dating the boyfriend long distance, but I found
myself more connected with PE friend than my boyfriend.
When
my boyfriend transferred to his third school and wound up living near me, I
realized he wasn’t The One. He drank
too much and was tight with money except when it came to transferring colleges
and purchasing music equipment. One time, my boyfriend surprised me by visiting
the music store where I worked. Stu was already there. I told my boyfriend that
nothing was going on between Stu and me, which was true. But I was lying to him
and myself about how my feelings were changing. While my boyfriend made me
frustrated and brought out the worst in me, Stu made me laugh and brought out
the best in me.
Just
about a year after the relationship started, I broke up with my boyfriend. I’d
hoped Stu liked me too, so I looked for signs. His ex-girlfriend asked him out.
He said no. Good sign. But if he was looking for good signs from me, I kept
blowing them. He brought me a teddy bear from the carnival with a heart. I
blurted that I didn’t like stuffed animals with hearts. Stupid me. We got
tickets to see a concert. I left the bag with the tickets at home. Stupider me.
A
week later on a perfect July night, we took a walk in the park while a band
played music in the background. Stu told me he liked me as more than a friend.
I told him I felt the same way. He kissed me. The band stop playing and the
audience applauded.
Stu
became my boyfriend.
The
next morning, flowers arrived at my house. I went from elation to
disappointment. The flowers were from my ex. When he called, I had to tell him
that six weeks after we’d broken up, I’d already moved on with the guy he’d
been threatened by all that time. A couple of years later, the three of us
wound up at the same university. Ex and I attended the same history class. No
hard feelings.
Stu
and I did well in school. He majored in Biology and then earned
his PhD in Biology. Thanks to him, I was
able to pass Calculus. Even though he’s my husband, we kept our friendship. He
still makes me laugh. 25 years after we met, I feel lucky to wake up next to
him every morning, and share a home and two children with him.
Sometimes we
bring up that first year. Stu admits to not being that interested in me in the
beginning, but he won’t say when his feelings changed. I can’t pinpoint a
specific time either. But at some point it happened for both of us.
And
I’m glad it did.
Thank you so much, Theresa for a beautifully written account of how you met Stu.
Keep up to date with all Theresa's writing adventures, by reading her blog, Theresa's Tales of Teaching Tribulation and Typing Teen Texts.
Friday 18 October 2013
I'm delighted to announce that the first 'How-I-Met-My-Husband' post will be published on Sunday October 20th
To get the ball rolling, I wrote a post where I invited people to share their stories of how they met their husband or wife. Theresa Milstein rose to the challenge and will be the first contributor.
Theresa blogs at Theresa's Tales of Teaching Tribulations and Typing Teen Texts and I very much enjoyed the excerpt from Theresa's story Saving Danger, which is in the contemporary fantasy genre.
In less than two days time, you can read Theresa's extremely well-written account of how she met her husband and how they became a couple here on Love for Beginners.
Teasers: Theresa and her husband met in High School, but Theresa makes clear that, "we were not high school sweethearts".
Their mutual dislike for Physical Education (PE) is integral to how they first met.
They were long-term friends before becoming romantically involved.
There is one reference to a character in the cult-classic film The Breakfast Club.
Theresa blogs at Theresa's Tales of Teaching Tribulations and Typing Teen Texts and I very much enjoyed the excerpt from Theresa's story Saving Danger, which is in the contemporary fantasy genre.
In less than two days time, you can read Theresa's extremely well-written account of how she met her husband and how they became a couple here on Love for Beginners.
Teasers: Theresa and her husband met in High School, but Theresa makes clear that, "we were not high school sweethearts".
Their mutual dislike for Physical Education (PE) is integral to how they first met.
They were long-term friends before becoming romantically involved.
There is one reference to a character in the cult-classic film The Breakfast Club.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)